News / Events

Cervical Screening Test (CST): How Australia Compares Globally

Cervical cancer remains one of the most preventable yet deadly cancers affecting women worldwide. Early detection through effective screening plays a pivotal role in reducing both incidence and mortality. However, screening methods, systems, and national policies differ significantly between countries. Australia is recognized as a global leader in cervical cancer prevention, having adopted the HPV-based Cervical Screening Test (CST) as the standard, replacing the traditional Pap smear.

This article outlines how Australia’s cervical screening approach differs from other countries, with a focus on key areas such as screening method, frequency, age eligibility, self-collection availability, and integration with HPV vaccination programs.


What is Cervical Cancer and What Causes It?

The overwhelming majority of cervical cancer cases are caused by persistent infection with high-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV), particularly types 16 and 18. This virus is sexually transmitted and can silently infect the cells of the cervix, leading to precancerous lesions that may take over 10 years to progress into cancer.

  • Over 99% of cervical cancers are linked to persistent high-risk HPV infection.
  • HPV infection often causes no symptoms and resolves on its own, but persistent infection can lead to dysplasia (precancerous changes).
  • Detecting HPV before cellular changes occur allows for earlier and more effective intervention.

Given this strong causal link, many countries are now transitioning from Pap smears (cytology-based tests) to HPV-based screening, which offers higher sensitivity and longer protection intervals.


Australia’s Approach: Cervical Screening Test (CST)

Since 2017, Australia has replaced the traditional Pap smear with HPV testing as the primary screening tool. The CST:

  • Detects the cause (HPV), not just the effect (abnormal cells).
  • Is offered every 5 years to women and people with a cervix aged 25–74.
  • Includes self-collection options since 2022 to increase participation, particularly among under-screened groups.
  • Is tightly integrated with the national HPV vaccination program, which began in 2007.

Comparison of Cervical Screening Systems: Australia vs. Other Countries

Key AreaAustraliaMany Other Countries
Primary Screening MethodHPV testPap smear (cytology)
Screening IntervalEvery 5 years (if HPV-negative)Every 2–3 years
Target Age Group25–74 yearsTypically starts at 21 or 25, varies
National ProgramGovernment-managed with active reminders and tracking (NCSP)Varies; often decentralized or voluntary
Self-CollectionAvailable to all eligible individuals since 2022Limited or pilot-only in many countries
HPV Vaccination IntegrationStrong integration with school-based vaccinationIntegration levels vary widely
Participation RatesImproving with self-collection; challenges remain in some groupsVaries significantly by country

Why is CST Every 5 Years in Australia?

One key question is: Why is screening every 5 years sufficient in Australia, while other countries screen more frequently?

  1. High Sensitivity of HPV Testing
    HPV tests have >90% sensitivity—far higher than Pap smears—meaning fewer false negatives and better early detection.
  2. Long Pre-cancerous Phase
    It often takes 10+ years for HPV to progress to cancer. A negative HPV result indicates a very low short-term risk, justifying a longer interval.
  3. Evidence-Based Policy
    Australia’s 5-year interval is backed by rigorous research and modeling, reviewed by national expert panels.

Benefits of Australia’s HPV-Based CST Program

  • Early and accurate detection of risk
  • Fewer false negatives compared to Pap smears
  • Reduced unnecessary treatments
  • Greater accessibility through self-collection
  • Cost-effective public health strategy
  • Synergy with HPV vaccination, leading to a projected elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem by 2035

Challenges in Other Countries

Many countries still rely primarily on the Pap smear due to:

  • Limited access to HPV testing technologies
  • Cost and infrastructure constraints
  • Lack of nationalized programs
  • Cultural or logistical barriers to participation
  • Historical hesitation around HPV vaccination programs

As a result, cervical cancer incidence and mortality remain higher in these regions. For instance:

  • In Japan, Pap smears are still standard, and HPV vaccination was suspended for nearly 8 years, leading to rising mortality in younger women.
  • In some low- and middle-income countries, screening access is low, and cervical cancer remains a leading cause of cancer death in women.

HPV Vaccination: A Cornerstone of Prevention

Australia’s success is also due to high HPV vaccination rates. Introduced in 2007, the National HPV Vaccination Program covers both girls and boys in school settings, significantly reducing the incidence of HPV-related diseases.

Other countries vary in uptake:

  • UK and Scandinavia have similarly high coverage and are also shifting toward elimination.
  • Some Asian and Eastern European countries report low vaccination rates due to public hesitancy or lack of funding.

Global Health Implications

The World Health Organization (WHO) has launched a Global Strategy to Eliminate Cervical Cancer, calling for:

  • 90% of girls to be vaccinated by age 15
  • 70% of women to be screened by 35 and again by 45
  • 90% of those with disease to receive appropriate care

Australia is on track to achieve these targets and serves as a model for others.


Conclusion

Australia’s CST program stands out globally for its scientific basis, safety, efficiency, and integration with vaccination efforts. While many countries are catching up, systemic differences in healthcare infrastructure, funding, and public education remain barriers.

Cervical cancer is preventable. Through regular HPV-based screening and vaccination, we can move closer to global elimination. For those in Australia, CST is a safe, evidence-backed option that empowers individuals to take control of their cervical health.


Contact Skyarch Medical Clinic Brisbane for more information.

  1. World Health Organization (WHO)Global Strategy to Accelerate the Elimination of Cervical Cancer as a Public Health Problem
    https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240014107
  2. The LancetGlobal Burden of Cervical Cancer: Past, Present, and Future
    https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(19)32765-5/fulltext
  3. Cancer AustraliaCervical Cancer in Australia: Statistics and Trends
    https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/cancer-types/cervical-cancer/cervical-cancer-australia-statistics
  4. Australian Government – Department of Health and Aged CareNational Cervical Screening Program (NCSP)
    https://www.health.gov.au/topics/cervical-screening
  5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW)Cervical Screening in Australia Reports
    https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer-screening/national-cervical-screening-program-monitoring-report
  6. The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA)Self-collection for HPV Screening: A Game-Changer for Under-screened Populations
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.51420
  7. HPV Information CentreGlobal and Country-Specific HPV and Cervical Cancer Statistics
    https://hpvcentre.net/statistics/reports/
  8. GLOBOCAN / IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer)Cervical Cancer Incidence and Mortality by Country (2020)
    https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)HPV and Cancer Statistics
    https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/hpv/statistics/
  10. National Cancer Center Japan – Cancer Information Service
    https://ganjoho.jp/reg_stat/statistics/stat/cancer/uterine_cervix.html
  11. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (Japan)HPV Vaccination and Cervical Screening Guidelines
    https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000187997.html
  12. Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG)Cervical Cancer Prevention Recommendations
    https://www.jsog.or.jp
  13. Journal of Epidemiology (Japan Epidemiological Association)Trends in Cervical Cancer Mortality in Young Japanese Women
    https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jea/advpub/0/advpub_JE20210142/_pdf
Scroll to Top